Top Technical Interview Questions for Engineers in 2025

In today's competitive tech environment, the traditional interview is failing to keep pace. The integration of AI in development workflows, the demand for highly specialized skills, and the expansion of the global talent pool require a more sophisticated approach to hiring. Standard technical interview questions for engineers often fall short, rewarding rote memorization over the genuine problem-solving ability needed to navigate future challenges. This guide moves beyond those outdated methods, focusing instead on questions that reveal a candidate's true architectural thinking, adaptability, and deep-seated engineering principles.

We've curated a comprehensive list of questions designed to test core competencies in a way that aligns with modern workforce management trends. For companies tapping into a new kind of staff augmentation to build cost-effective, global teams, asking the right questions is the critical first step. This isn't just about finding someone who can code; it's about identifying talent that can innovate, collaborate remotely, and contribute to a resilient, world-class engineering organization. This listicle provides the specific, actionable questions and evaluation frameworks you need to distinguish a good candidate from a great one. You'll learn how to probe for the skills that truly matter, ensuring your next hire is equipped to drive your company's success, not just pass a test.

1. System Design - Design a URL Shortener

Among the most classic technical interview questions for engineers, designing a URL shortener like bit.ly or TinyURL is a fundamental test of system design proficiency. This question assesses a candidate's ability to architect a scalable, resilient, and efficient distributed system from the ground up. It forces them to think beyond simple code and consider the entire lifecycle of a request, from initial URL submission to the final redirection.

Interviewers use this problem to evaluate core competencies in several key areas:

• Scalability and Performance: Can the system handle millions or even billions of requests without degradation?

• Database Design: How would you schema the database? SQL vs. NoSQL trade-offs are central here.

• API Architecture: Designing clean, RESTful endpoints for creating and retrieving short URLs.

• Distributed Systems Concepts: Understanding of load balancing, caching strategies, and data partitioning.

The process of designing a URL shortener follows a logical progression, as illustrated in the infographic below, which highlights the foundational steps from initial requirements to high-level architectural decisions.

This visual flow emphasizes that a robust design starts with clear requirements before moving to technical implementation details like encoding and scaling.

Why This Question is Effective

This question is a favorite at major tech companies like Google and Amazon because it's a microcosm of real-world engineering challenges. It requires a candidate to make and justify critical design trade-offs. For example, how do you generate a unique, short key? A base-62 encoding of an auto-incrementing ID is a common approach, but what are the potential bottlenecks with that method in a distributed environment?

A strong answer demonstrates a methodical approach, starting with clarifying functional (create short URL, redirect) and non-functional (high availability, low latency) requirements. As hiring managers increasingly look for engineers who can contribute to large-scale systems, understanding these principles is crucial for scaling engineering teams without the chaos that often accompanies rapid growth. A candidate who can thoughtfully discuss caching layers (like Redis) and load balancing strategies proves they are ready for complex, high-impact projects.

2. Data Structures and Algorithms - Reverse a Linked List

As a foundational problem in computer science, reversing a singly linked list is one of the most common technical interview questions for engineers. This question is a direct test of a candidate's grasp of data structures, pointer manipulation, and fundamental algorithmic logic. Interviewers use it to quickly gauge a programmer's ability to handle state and references, which are core skills for any software development role.

This problem evaluates a candidate's competency in several critical areas:

• Pointer/Reference Manipulation: Can the candidate correctly manage pointers to reverse the list's direction without losing nodes?

• Algorithmic Thinking: Can they devise both an iterative and a recursive solution and articulate the trade-offs?

• Edge Case Handling: Do they account for empty lists or lists with only a single node?

• Complexity Analysis: Can they accurately determine the time O(n) and space O(1) for the iterative solution?

The process requires a candidate to traverse the list while reassigning pointers. The iterative solution, often preferred for its O(1) space complexity, involves using three pointers: , , and .

This visual representation helps clarify how pointers are systematically updated at each step to reverse the node connections effectively.

Why This Question is Effective

This question is a staple at companies like Microsoft and Amazon because it cleanly isolates a fundamental programming skill. Unlike complex system design problems, it offers a clear, verifiable solution that reveals a candidate’s attention to detail and logical reasoning. A strong candidate will not just code a solution but will also walk through it, drawing the list structure and explaining how the pointers change with each iteration.

Discussing both iterative and recursive approaches demonstrates a deeper understanding. The ability to articulate why the iterative solution is often more memory-efficient (O(1) space vs. O(n) space for the recursive call stack) is a sign of a well-rounded engineer. As companies increasingly look for talent globally, this type of universal, language-agnostic problem serves as a standardized benchmark for evaluating core skills, which is a key principle in a modern workforce management strategy focused on objective talent assessment over pedigree. An engineer who masters these fundamentals is better prepared to tackle more complex, real-world challenges.

3. Database Design - Design a Social Media Database Schema

Designing the database schema for a social media platform is a cornerstone of technical interview questions for engineers specializing in backend or data-centric roles. This task evaluates a candidate’s grasp of relational database principles, including normalization, indexing, and handling complex relationships. It challenges them to create a logical data model that can support features like user profiles, posts, comments, likes, and follower/friend connections.

Interviewers present this problem to assess critical database design skills:

• Relational Modeling: Can the candidate identify core entities (users, posts) and model their relationships (one-to-many, many-to-many)?

• Performance and Scalability: How would they use indexing to optimize common queries, like fetching a user's feed?

• Data Integrity: What constraints and data types are appropriate to ensure the data remains consistent and valid?

• Trade-off Analysis: Understanding when to denormalize for read performance versus normalizing for data integrity.

A candidate's ability to model complex social graphs, such as those used by Facebook or LinkedIn, reveals their depth of understanding. They must consider how to efficiently store and retrieve data for millions of users and billions of interactions.

Why This Question is Effective

This question effectively simulates a real-world backend engineering task, making it an excellent predictor of on-the-job performance. It’s not just about SQL syntax; it’s about architectural thinking. A strong candidate will begin by defining the core entities and their relationships, such as the many-to-many relationship between users (for friendships) or between users and posts (for likes).

The discussion naturally extends to scalability. How would the schema evolve to handle a massive influx of users and content? This is where an engineer can demonstrate forward-thinking by discussing partitioning strategies (sharding) or the potential use of a graph database like Neo4j for handling complex relationship queries. As companies look to build robust platforms, finding engineers who can design a solid data foundation is paramount. This skill is crucial for enabling the very advancements in technology such as AI and machine learning that rely on well-structured, performant data backends to power recommendation engines and content feeds. A well-designed schema is the bedrock upon which scalable, intelligent applications are built.

4. Algorithms - Find Two Numbers That Sum to Target

Often the very first coding challenge presented in a technical interview, the "Two Sum" problem is a foundational question that effectively gauges a candidate's fundamental programming skills. This question asks the engineer to find two numbers within an array that add up to a specific target value. It’s a classic for a reason, testing core concepts like data structures, algorithmic complexity, and problem-solving logic in a single, accessible exercise.

Interviewers rely on this problem to assess several key competencies:

• Algorithmic Thinking: Can the candidate move from a naive, brute-force solution to an optimized one?

• Data Structure Knowledge: Do they understand when and why to use a hash map (or dictionary) for efficient lookups?

• Time-Space Complexity: Can they articulate the trade-offs between an O(n²) solution and a more efficient O(n) approach?

• Code Clarity: Is their implementation clean, readable, and does it handle edge cases correctly?

The problem appears simple on the surface, but its elegance lies in the different paths a candidate can take to solve it. A junior developer might start with nested loops, while a more seasoned engineer will immediately reach for a hash map to achieve a linear time solution, demonstrating a deeper understanding of efficiency.

Why This Question is Effective

As the most popular problem on platforms like LeetCode, "Two Sum" is a universal standard in technical interviews at companies from startups to FAANG. Its effectiveness comes from its ability to quickly reveal a candidate's thought process. A strong candidate won't just write the code; they will start by clarifying requirements and discussing the brute-force approach (O(n²)) before explaining how a hash table can reduce the time complexity to O(n) at the cost of O(n) space.

This question serves as an excellent filter. It helps hiring managers quickly identify engineers who can not only solve problems but also optimize their solutions and communicate the trade-offs involved. For companies leveraging contingent labor to build global teams, using such standardized questions ensures a consistent and high bar for talent, regardless of where the engineer is located. Discussing variations like "Three Sum" or finding the pair with the closest sum can further probe a candidate's problem-solving depth.

5. Behavioral/Technical - Describe a Challenging Technical Problem You Solved

This hybrid question masterfully blends behavioral assessment with deep technical inquiry, asking candidates to narrate a complex problem they've overcome. Unlike purely theoretical problems, it grounds a candidate’s skills in real-world application, revealing their problem-solving methodology, resilience, and technical depth. It's a powerful tool for gauging how an engineer navigates ambiguity, makes critical decisions under pressure, and learns from experience.

Interviewers from companies like Amazon and Google use this question to assess several key competencies:

• Problem-Solving Process: How do they deconstruct a complex, ambiguous problem into manageable steps?

• Technical Justification: Can they clearly articulate the technical trade-offs they made and why?

• Ownership and Impact: What was their specific role and what was the measurable outcome of their work?

• Communication Skills: How effectively can they explain a nuanced technical situation to someone else?

A candidate's story, whether it's about debugging an elusive production memory leak or re-architecting a monolithic service, provides a window into their actual on-the-job performance and engineering maturity.

Why This Question is Effective

This question is a cornerstone of modern technical interviews because it moves beyond rote memorization of algorithms and into the practical application of engineering principles. It’s not just about what a candidate knows, but how they apply that knowledge. A strong answer follows the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to a certain extent to structure the narrative, focusing on personal contributions and the reasoning behind each technical decision.

For hiring managers, this reveals a candidate's thought process, their ability to handle unforeseen challenges, and their capacity for reflection. Did they consider multiple solutions? Did they collaborate with others? What did they learn that they would apply to future problems? This level of insight is invaluable for building resilient teams. Mastering this question is a key part of successfully navigating the software engineer interview process and demonstrating readiness for complex engineering roles.

6. Object-Oriented Design - Design a Parking Lot System

A staple of object-oriented design (OOD) interviews, the "Design a Parking Lot" problem is a practical exercise that reveals a candidate's ability to model real-world systems using core OOP principles. This question challenges engineers to structure a complex domain with multiple interacting entities, such as vehicles, parking spots, tickets, and payment systems, into a clean, maintainable, and extensible class structure.

Interviewers use this problem to evaluate several fundamental competencies:

• OOP Principles: Mastery of encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, and abstraction.

• Class Design: The ability to identify core classes, define their responsibilities, and establish relationships (e.g., association, aggregation).

• Design Patterns: Applying patterns like Factory (for creating vehicle objects), Strategy (for different pricing models), or Singleton (for the parking lot instance).

• System Extensibility: Can the design accommodate new requirements, such as adding electric vehicle charging spots or a valet service, without a major overhaul?

A strong candidate will begin by identifying the core classes required for the system. They will define the attributes and behaviors for each, such as a class with subclasses for and , and a class with different sizes. The interaction between these classes to handle operations like parking a vehicle and calculating fees is central to the problem.

Why This Question is Effective

This question effectively simulates the process of translating business requirements into a concrete software design, a critical skill for any mid-to-senior level engineer. Unlike purely algorithmic problems, it has no single "right" answer, which allows interviewers to assess a candidate's thought process, justification for design choices, and communication skills. How a candidate handles concepts like spot allocation for different-sized vehicles or designs the payment calculation logic demonstrates their practical problem-solving abilities.

A well-structured answer involves a step-by-step approach: first defining the core objects, then establishing their relationships, and finally implementing the key methods for system operations like and . As companies increasingly seek engineers who can build robust and scalable application architecture, this question serves as an excellent litmus test. The ability to model complex systems is foundational, especially with the rise of AI-driven smart city applications, where parking management is a key component of a larger, interconnected infrastructure.

7. Concurrency - Implement a Thread-Safe Counter

A core challenge in modern software engineering involves managing shared state across multiple threads. The task to implement a thread-safe counter is one of the classic technical interview questions for engineers that directly probes this skill. It requires a candidate to build a simple counter that can be incremented by concurrent threads without leading to data corruption or inaccurate results. This problem is fundamental to understanding and preventing race conditions.

Interviewers present this problem to assess a candidate's grasp of essential concurrency concepts:

• Thread Safety: Can the candidate identify why a simple operation is not atomic and thus unsafe?

• Synchronization Mechanisms: What tools does the candidate use? Common answers include mutexes, locks, semaphores, or atomic operations.

• Performance Trade-offs: Does the candidate understand the performance cost of locking and can they discuss alternatives like lock-free data structures?

• Deadlocks and Livelocks: Can they reason about potential pitfalls when using more complex locking schemes?

This question forces a discussion about the balance between correctness and performance, a constant tension in building multi-threaded applications. The image below illustrates the concept of a race condition, where multiple threads attempt to modify a shared resource, leading to an unpredictable outcome without proper synchronization.

This visual highlights the critical moment where concurrent access without protection can break an application's logic.

Why This Question is Effective

This question is highly effective because it distills a complex topic into a manageable, code-level problem. It reveals a candidate's depth of knowledge about how modern processors and operating systems handle concurrent execution. A strong candidate will not just provide one solution, but will discuss several, such as using a block in Java, a in C++, or integers provided by many languages.

The discussion can naturally extend to real-world scenarios like managing connection pools, tracking web server request counts, or collecting metrics in distributed systems. As companies increasingly rely on parallel processing to handle massive workloads, hiring engineers with a solid foundation in concurrency is non-negotiable. This is particularly true for businesses adopting a new kind of staff augmentation to integrate global talent, as it ensures that distributed teams can collaborate effectively on complex, performance-sensitive codebases. A candidate who can articulate the trade-offs between a simple lock and a more complex, high-performance atomic operation demonstrates the maturity needed for today's engineering challenges.

8. Network Programming - Explain How HTTP/HTTPS Works

Understanding the fundamental protocols of the web is non-negotiable for most software engineers, making this a staple among technical interview questions for engineers. This question probes a candidate's grasp of how clients, like web browsers, and servers communicate. It goes beyond a simple definition, requiring a detailed explanation of the request-response cycle, the role of headers, and the significance of status codes.

Interviewers use this problem to evaluate a candidate's knowledge in several core areas:

• Web Fundamentals: Can the candidate articulate the client-server model and the stateless nature of HTTP?

• Protocol Mechanics: Understanding of request methods (GET, POST, etc.), headers, and status codes (2xx, 4xx, 5xx).

• Security Concepts: A clear explanation of how HTTPS provides security through SSL/TLS encryption and certificate validation.

• Performance Optimization: Knowledge of caching, session management with cookies, and the evolution to newer protocols like HTTP/2.

The process of explaining HTTP/HTTPS involves breaking down a complex interaction into sequential, understandable steps. It starts with the initial DNS lookup, moves through the TCP handshake, the SSL/TLS negotiation for HTTPS, and culminates in the exchange of HTTP messages. This demonstrates a holistic view of web communication.

Why This Question is Effective

This question is powerful because it connects abstract networking concepts to the tangible experience of browsing the web or using an API. It reveals whether a candidate has rote-memorized definitions or truly understands the underlying mechanics of modern applications. A strong answer will not just list facts but will tell a story of a request's journey from client to server and back.

Top candidates will move beyond the basics, discussing how HTTP/2’s multiplexing solves the head-of-line blocking problem of HTTP/1.1 or how HTTPS certificates are issued and validated by a Certificate Authority (CA). As companies increasingly rely on globally distributed teams and cloud infrastructure, this foundational knowledge is critical. Understanding these protocols is essential for debugging issues, optimizing performance, and building secure, resilient applications for a global user base. This foundational expertise is a key trait hiring managers look for when building effective, globally sourced engineering teams.

9. Problem Solving - Debug a Performance Issue

Beyond theoretical knowledge, the ability to methodically debug a live system is one of the most practical skills tested in technical interview questions for engineers. This scenario-based question presents a candidate with a vague but critical problem, like a slow API endpoint or high CPU usage on a server, and asks them to walk through their debugging process. It is a direct test of their systematic problem-solving skills, familiarity with diagnostic tools, and ability to think under pressure.

Interviewers use this problem to evaluate several core competencies:

• Systematic Thinking: Does the candidate have a structured methodology, or do they jump to conclusions?

• Tooling Knowledge: Can they name and describe relevant profiling, monitoring, and logging tools (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana, New Relic, or platform-specific profilers)?

• Hypothesis-Driven Debugging: Do they form a hypothesis, test it with data, and iterate based on the results?

• Root Cause Analysis: Can they differentiate between a symptom (e.g., slow page load) and the underlying cause (e.g., an inefficient N+1 database query)?

A strong answer begins with information gathering, such as asking clarifying questions about the system's architecture, recent deployments, and the scope of the impact. The candidate should then outline a plan to reproduce the issue in a controlled environment before diving into potential causes across the stack, from the network and infrastructure to the application code and database.

Why This Question is Effective

This question is highly effective because it mirrors the day-to-day reality of a software or site reliability engineer. Production systems fail in complex ways, and engineers who can logically narrow down the problem space are invaluable. A candidate who can articulate a process, such as the USE (Utilization, Saturation, Errors) Method for infrastructure or flame graphs for code profiling, demonstrates a level of practical experience that a simple algorithm question cannot.

Top candidates will discuss not just finding the fix but also verifying it and implementing safeguards to prevent regression. This holistic approach shows they understand the full engineering lifecycle. For hiring managers, identifying engineers with these skills is key to improving developer productivity and maintaining system stability. Discussing how to set up better monitoring or alerting as a follow-up action further proves that the candidate thinks about long-term system health, a critical mindset for building resilient and high-performing teams.

Technical Interview Questions Comparison Matrix

Item	Implementation Complexity	Resource Requirements	Expected Outcomes	Ideal Use Cases	Key Advantages
System Design - Design a URL Shortener	High	High (databases, caching, load balancers)	Scalable, fault-tolerant URL shortening system	Senior-level system design interviews	Tests broad system architecture and scalability
Data Structures & Algorithms - Reverse a Linked List	Low	Low (basic programming environment)	Correctly reversed linked list	Junior to mid-level algorithm assessment	Clear, well-defined coding fundamentals
Database Design - Design Social Media DB Schema	Medium	Medium (database servers, design tools)	Normalized, efficient relational schema	Backend/database design interviews	Tests practical database and normalization skills
Algorithms - Find Two Numbers That Sum to Target	Low	Low (simple runtime environment)	Efficient, optimized algorithm solution	Entry to mid-level algorithm questions	Multiple solution approaches, fundamental skills
Behavioral/Technical - Describe Challenging Technical Problem	Low to Medium	Low (interview setting)	Insight into candidate problem-solving and communication	All levels behavioral/technical interviews	Reveals real experience and communication skills
Object-Oriented Design - Design a Parking Lot System	Medium	Medium (design tools, UML)	Modular, extensible OOP system model	Mid-level design interviews	Demonstrates OOP concepts and design patterns
Concurrency - Implement Thread-Safe Counter	Medium to High	Medium (multi-threaded environment)	Thread-safe, performant concurrent counter	Mid to senior system-level programming	Tests deep concurrency and synchronization knowledge
Network Programming - Explain HTTP/HTTPS	Low to Medium	Low (conceptual, some tools optional)	Clear understanding of web protocols and security	Entry to mid-level web/network roles	Fundamental web and security protocol knowledge
Problem Solving - Debug a Performance Issue	Medium	Medium (profiling/debugging tools)	Systematic debugging methodology demonstrated	Mid to senior problem-solving interviews	Practical, real-world system troubleshooting skills

Hire Smarter: Building Your Global Engineering Powerhouse

Navigating the landscape of modern talent acquisition requires more than just a list of questions; it demands a fundamental shift in strategy. The technical interview questions for engineers detailed in this guide, from designing a URL shortener to debugging complex performance issues, are not merely academic hurdles. They are diagnostic tools designed to reveal a candidate's core problem-solving DNA, their architectural intuition, and their ability to collaborate effectively. Mastering the art of asking these questions is the first step toward building a truly world-class engineering team.

However, the real competitive advantage lies in recognizing the emerging trends in Workforce management. The traditional, localized hiring model is rapidly becoming obsolete. We are in the era of globalized talent, contingent labor, and a new, more agile form of staff augmentation. The challenge is no longer just finding skilled engineers; it’s about identifying, vetting, and integrating the best talent from anywhere in the world, efficiently and at the most affordable cost.

Beyond Knowledge: Assessing True Problem-Solving Prowess

The most insightful interview processes move beyond rote memorization. A candidate might know the textbook definition of a thread-safe counter, but can they articulate the trade-offs between different synchronization mechanisms in a real-world scenario? This is the critical distinction.

The questions covered in this article emphasize this approach:

• System Design and OOD questions test a candidate’s ability to see the bigger picture, manage complexity, and make pragmatic trade-offs.

• Data Structures and Algorithm challenges reveal their foundational knowledge and their ability to write clean, efficient code under pressure.

• Behavioral-technical prompts provide a window into their past experiences, their communication skills, and their resilience in the face of ambiguity.

This shift from "what you know" to "how you think" is essential. It's the key to identifying engineers who can not only solve today's problems but also adapt and innovate to meet the challenges of tomorrow.

Integrating AI and Global Teams into Your Hiring Framework

Emerging trends are reshaping how we build teams. Advancements in technology such as AI are playing a bigger role in sourcing and initial screening, allowing hiring managers to focus their energy on high-value, in-depth technical discussions. Simultaneously, the rise of fully managed, global talent solutions offers an unprecedented opportunity to access top-tier engineers without the traditional overhead of international hiring.

This new kind of staff augmentation is not just about finding affordable talent; it's about building a diverse, dynamic, and resilient organization. By leveraging a global talent pool, you can:

• Accelerate Timelines: Fill critical roles faster by tapping into markets with a high supply of specialized skills.

• Increase Innovation: Foster a richer, more creative environment with engineers from diverse backgrounds and perspectives.

• Optimize Costs: Access world-class talent at a sustainable cost, allowing you to scale your engineering capacity more effectively.

A key aspect of building a high-performing engineering team is equipping them with tools that maximize efficiency. Once hired, ensuring they have an optimal setup is crucial for retaining top talent. Understanding the top benefits of dual monitors for your productivity can be a simple yet impactful way to enhance their daily workflow and show your commitment to their success.

Ultimately, refining your technical interview process is a strategic imperative. It's the gateway to building a resilient, innovative, and globally competitive engineering powerhouse. The frameworks and questions provided here are your blueprint for not just hiring engineers, but for architecting the future of your organization.

---

Ready to stop searching and start building your global engineering team? shorepod offers a full-service Talent-as-a-Service (TaaS) platform that handles the entire lifecycle, from rigorous vetting using advanced technical interview questions for engineers to seamless onboarding, payroll, and compliance. Discover how shorepod can connect you with the world's top pre-vetted engineers and build your dream team today.